Current:Home > reviewsFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -GrowthInsight
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
NovaQuant Quantitative Think Tank Center View
Date:2025-04-06 20:53:51
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (96)
Related
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- Loungefly's Sitewide Sale Includes Up to 75% Off on New Releases & Fan Favorites: Disney, Pixar & More
- Céline Dion Was Taking Up to 90-Milligram Doses of Valium Amid Battle With Stiff-Person Syndrome
- Robert De Niro and Tiffany Chen Enjoy Rare Date Night at Tribeca Festival
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- Montana man gets 2 months in a federal prison for evidence tampering after killing grizzly bear
- Genius Products That Will Make Your Life so Much Easier (and Cost Less Than $10)
- Truck hauling 150 pigs overturns on Ohio interstate
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- Oprah says book club pick 'Familiaris' by David Wroblewski 'brilliantly' explores life's purpose
Ranking
- Finally, good retirement news! Southwest pilots' plan is a bright spot, experts say
- MLB's most affordable ballparks: Which stadiums offer the most bang for your buck?
- Idaho police force loses millions worth of gear and vehicles in fire
- Who is Tony Evans? Pastor who stepped down from church over ‘sin’ committed years ago
- Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
- 12-year-old boy hospitalized after sand hole collapsed on him at Michigan park
- Dog fight! Joey Chestnut out of July 4 hot dog eating contest due to deal with rival brand
- The Friday Afternoon Club: Griffin Dunne on a literary family's legacy
Recommendation
What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
Nicki Minaj Shares Teary Video About Beautiful Baby Boy That Sparks Concern From Fans
Missouri executes David Hosier in former lover's murder: 'I leave you all with love'
Who is Tony Evans? Pastor who stepped down from church over ‘sin’ committed years ago
Who are the most valuable sports franchises? Forbes releases new list of top 50 teams
Where Hunter Biden's tax case stands after guilty verdict in federal gun trial
Off-duty guard charged with killing Seattle-area teen after mistaking toy for gun, authorities say
This new restaurant bans anyone under 30: Here's why