Current:Home > MarketsAir travelers sue CrowdStrike after massive computer outage disrupts flights -GrowthInsight
Air travelers sue CrowdStrike after massive computer outage disrupts flights
View
Date:2025-04-14 17:13:51
CrowdStrike's legal troubles from last month's massive global computer outage deepened on Monday, as the cybersecurity company was sued by air travelers whose flights were delayed or canceled.
In a proposed class action filed in the Austin, Texas, federal court, three flyers blamed CrowdStrike's negligence in testing and deploying its software for the outage, which also disrupted banks, hospitals and emergency lines around the world.
The plaintiffs said that as flyers scrambled to get to their destinations, many spent hundreds of dollars on lodging, meals and alternative travel, while others missed work or suffered health problems from having to sleep on the airport floor.
They said CrowdStrike should pay compensatory and punitive damages to anyone whose flight was disrupted, after technology-related flight groundings for Southwest Airlines and other carriers in 2023 made the outage "entirely foreseeable."
CrowdStrike lawsuit:Company sued by shareholders over huge software outage
CrowdStrike said in a statement: "We believe this case lacks merit and we will vigorously defend the company."
It provided an identical statement in response to a shareholder lawsuit filed on July 31, after the company's stock price had fallen by about one-third.
The outage stemmed from a flawed software update that crashed more than 8 million computers.
Delta Air Lines has said it may take legal action against Austin-based CrowdStrike after canceling more than 6,000 flights, at a cost of about $500 million.
On Sunday, CrowdStrike said it was neither grossly negligent nor at fault for Delta's problems, and that the Atlanta-based carrier did not accept its offer for help.
Delta faces a U.S. Department of Transportation probe into why it needed more time than rivals to recover from the outage.
Monday's case is del Rio et al v CrowdStrike Inc, U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas, No. 24-00881.
veryGood! (367)
Related
- Federal Spending Freeze Could Have Widespread Impact on Environment, Emergency Management
- Oregon authorities recover body of award-winning chef who drowned in river accident
- Alabama inmate Keith Edmund Gavin to be 3rd inmate executed in state in 2024. What to know
- The Grateful Dead and Francis Ford Coppola are among the newest Kennedy Center Honors recipients
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- Mike Tyson set to resume preparations for Jake Paul fight after layoff for ulcer flareup
- Navy exonerates Black sailors in deadly 1944 port blast. Families say it was long overdue.
- Stegosaurus fossil fetches nearly $45M, setting record for dinosaur auctions
- 'Most Whopper
- Pedro Hill: What is cryptocurrency
Ranking
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- Climate change is making days longer, according to new research
- U.S. intelligence detected Iranian plot against Trump, officials say
- Report: WNBA agrees to $2.2B, 11-year media rights deal with ESPN, Amazon, NBC
- Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
- Chicago Sky trade Marina Mabrey to Connecticut Sun for two players, draft picks
- Stegosaurus sells for almost $45 million at Sotheby's auction, the most for any dinosaur fossil
- Sheryl Lee Ralph overjoyed by Emmy Awards nomination: 'Never gets old'
Recommendation
Brianna LaPaglia Reveals The Meaning Behind Her "Chickenfry" Nickname
Appeals court affirms Mississippi’s ban on voting after some felonies, including timber theft
Many people are embracing BDSM. Is it about more than just sex?
Kourtney Kardashian Reveals When She’ll Stop Breastfeeding Baby Rocky
Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
Stegosaurus named Apex goes for $44.6M at auction, most expensive fossil ever sold
Lucas Turner: Breaking down the three major blockchains
Alaska judge who resigned in disgrace didn’t disclose conflicts in 23 cases, investigation finds