Current:Home > reviewsVeterans sue U.S. Defense and Veterans Affairs departments to get access to infertility treatments -GrowthInsight
Veterans sue U.S. Defense and Veterans Affairs departments to get access to infertility treatments
Algosensey Quantitative Think Tank Center View
Date:2025-04-10 20:36:03
NEW YORK (AP) — The U.S. Defense Department and the Department of Veteran Affairs are making it difficult, and sometimes impossible for veterans to get infertility treatments, according to lawsuits filed Wednesday in federal courts in New York and Boston.
The lawsuits seek to hold the United States accountable for creating obstacles to health care access for a population that advocates say has a higher rate of infertility than the population at large.
Both suits attempt to obtain in vitro fertilization coverage for military service members and veterans who don’t fit the Veterans Affairs definition of infertility, which is limited to married, heterosexual couples.
In a release, West Point graduate and Army veteran Renée Mihail said she has seen many friends and colleagues struggle with fertility after serving in the military.
“This is not just a coincidence; Our service has seriously impacted our ability to build families,” said Mihail, a law student intern with the Yale Veterans Legal Services Clinic.
The lawsuit in Manhattan federal court against the U.S. Defense Department and the Department of Veteran Affairs said infertility is pervasive in the military community, with research revealing that contributing factors include combat-related injuries, exposure to toxic chemicals and environmental hazards, sexual assault and post-traumatic stress disorder.
According to the lawsuits, thousands of active military members and veterans face discriminatory and arbitrary reasons why they are rejected for appropriate treatment when they try to start having a family.
The lawsuit said those seeking in vitro fertilization coverage, the most effective treatment for infertility, are rejected if they are single, an unmarried couple, in a same-sex relationship or are a couple with the same reproductive organs, or if they lack proof that infertility is related to their service.
It sought a judge’s order to find that it is discriminatory and unconstitutional for the United States to reject treatment based on sex, sexual orientation, marital status or on the cause of the infertility.
In Boston, Air Force veteran Ashley Sheffield sued the Department of Veteran Affairs, saying she was rejected for in vitro fertilization treatments because she is married to a woman.
“I’m shocked and disappointed that the VA is denying me and other veterans IVF benefits because we’re in same-sex marriages,” Sheffield said in a release. “We are entitled to equal treatment, and we should no longer be treated as second-class citizens.”
Defense Department spokesperson Nicole R. Schwegman said in an email that it would be inappropriate to comment on ongoing litigation.
A spokesperson for the Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
veryGood! (863)
Related
- NHL in ASL returns, delivering American Sign Language analysis for Deaf community at Winter Classic
- Fighting Climate Change Can Be a Lonely Battle in Oil Country, Especially for a Kid
- Michigan man arrested for planning mass killing at synagogue
- Q&A: 50 Years Ago, a Young Mother’s Book Helped Start an Environmental Revolution
- Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
- Empty Grocery Shelves and Rotting, Wasted Vegetables: Two Sides of a Supply Chain Problem
- Trump (Sort of) Accepted Covid-19 Modeling. Don’t Expect the Same on Climate Change.
- With Tax Credit in Doubt, Wind Industry Ponders if It Can Stand on Its Own
- McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
- Ravaged by Drought, a Honduran Village Faces a Choice: Pray for Rain or Migrate
Ranking
- DoorDash steps up driver ID checks after traffic safety complaints
- This Week in Clean Economy: GOP Seizes on Solyndra as an Election Issue
- Exxon Shareholders Approve Climate Resolution: 62% Vote for Disclosure
- This Week in Clean Economy: U.S. Electric Carmakers Get the Solyndra Treatment
- Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
- Exxon Shareholders Approve Climate Resolution: 62% Vote for Disclosure
- Judge Orders Dakota Access Pipeline Review, Citing Environmental Justice
- As Trump Touts Ethanol, Scientists Question the Fuel’s Climate Claims
Recommendation
Travis Hunter, the 2
Fighting Climate Change Can Be a Lonely Battle in Oil Country, Especially for a Kid
GOP Fails to Kill Methane Rule in a Capitol Hill Defeat for Oil and Gas Industry
Northeast Aims to Remedy E.V. ‘Range Anxiety’ with 11-State Charging Network
Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
California could ban certain food additives due to concerns over health impacts
This Week in Clean Economy: GOP Seizes on Solyndra as an Election Issue
Wedding costs are on the rise. Here's how to save money while planning