Current:Home > InvestSouth Dakota governor asks state Supreme Court about conflict of interest after lawmaker resigns -GrowthInsight
South Dakota governor asks state Supreme Court about conflict of interest after lawmaker resigns
View
Date:2025-04-16 10:08:46
PIERRE, S.D. (AP) — South Dakota Republican Gov. Kristi Noem has requested guidance from the state’s Supreme Court about conflict-of-interest rules for lawmakers, several weeks after a South Dakota state lawmaker resigned and agreed to repay $500,000 in federal COVID-19 relief that she received for her day care business.
Jessica Castleberry was a state senator when she received the COVID-19 stimulus funding. Doing so violated a state Supreme Court advisory warning state lawmakers that it is unconstitutional for them to accept federal pandemic funding.
Noem, Attorney General Marty Jackley and two Republican lawmakers have sent letters to the court seeking clarity on what else is illegal, the Sioux Falls Argus Leader reported Thursday.
According to the state Constitution, lawmakers are banned from entering into state contracts “directly or indirectly” during their term and for a year after they finish serving in office.
In her letter, Noem raised specific questions about indirect contracts: Can lawmakers or their spouses be employed by school districts or counties? Can their businesses subcontract with the state for goods and services? And can they receive foster care reimbursements?
Majority Leader Sen. Lee Schoenbeck, a Republican of Watertown, said in his letter that “a literal reading of the ‘indirectly’ language ... would exclude a very large portion of South Dakota’s population,” according to the Argus Leader.
The letters also said lawmakers continuously vote on spending packages that fund schools and counties where the lawmakers or their spouses work.
Noem wrote that she is seeking guidance as soon as possible because she still needs to appoint someone to Castleberry’s open seat before the Legislature convenes in January.
Schoenbeck added that, depending on the court’s ruling, a number of lawmakers may need to resign or pay the state back for services received.
veryGood! (2684)
Related
- Person accused of accosting Rep. Nancy Mace at Capitol pleads not guilty to assault charge
- CDC recommends new booster shots to fight omicron
- Despite its innocently furry appearance, the puss caterpillar's sting is brutal
- An E. coli outbreak possibly linked to Wendy's has expanded to six states
- Pressure on a veteran and senator shows what’s next for those who oppose Trump
- Judge agrees to reveal backers of George Santos' $500,000 bond, but keeps names hidden for now
- Today’s Climate: June 2, 2010
- Selling Sunset Turns Up the Heat With New Competition in Explosive Season 6 Trailer
- Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
- You Won't Be Sleepless Over This Rare Photo of Meg Ryan
Ranking
- New Mexico governor seeks funding to recycle fracking water, expand preschool, treat mental health
- Climate Change Is Happening Faster Than Expected, and It’s More Extreme
- Pence officially files paperwork to run for president, kicking off 2024 bid
- U.S. Geothermal Industry Heats Up as It Sees Most Gov’t Support in 25 Years
- Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
- Peabody Settlement Shows Muscle of Law Now Aimed at Exxon
- Selfless by Hyram: Why Women Everywhere Love This Influencer's Skincare Line
- A Royal Refresher on Who's Who at King Charles III's Coronation
Recommendation
Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
Driver charged after car jumps curb in NYC, killing pedestrian and injuring 4 others
Mother and daughter charged after 71-year-old grandmother allegedly killed at home
Ed Sheeran Wins in Copyright Trial Over Thinking Out Loud
Google unveils a quantum chip. Could it help unlock the universe's deepest secrets?
Ed Sheeran Wins in Copyright Trial Over Thinking Out Loud
Today’s Climate: May 26, 2010
Whatever happened to the Indonesian rehab that didn't insist on abstinence?