Current:Home > NewsAppeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight -GrowthInsight
Appeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight
Chainkeen Exchange View
Date:2025-04-07 13:02:32
Washington — A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., rejected a request by former President Donald Trump to reconsider an order limiting what he can say about his criminal case related to the aftermath of the 2020 election, setting up a potential Supreme Court fight over the matter.
In a short unsigned order issued Tuesday, the judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Trump's request that they take up the dispute over the gag order "en banc," meaning in front of the full court. A three-judge panel largely upheld the gag order in December, allowing Trump to request a review by the full appeals court.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump in Washington, issued an order in October at the request of Smith that barred Trump from making inflammatory remarks targeting Smith, his staff, court personnel and possible witnesses who may be called to testify in the case.
The three-judge panel upheld most of Chutkan's order, ruling that Trump cannot target potential witnesses or speak publicly about any lawyers involved in the case — except Smith himself — or their families. However, Trump can continue criticizing the Biden administration and the Justice Department, and can claim that Smith's prosecution is politically motivated.
Tuesday's order denying Trump's appeal indicated the decision was unanimous, with no judges requesting a vote on the matter. Trump's attorneys had previously indicated that they would likely take the matter to the Supreme Court if the appeals court did not rule in their favor.
CBS News has reached out to Trump's campaign for comment.
In the December order, the three judges — Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard and Bradley Garcia — said they agreed with Chutkan that some aspects of Trump's public comments "pose a significant and imminent threat" to the integrity of the ongoing criminal prosecution, "warranting a speech-constraining protective order."
But the judges also said the order put in place by Chutkan "sweeps in more protected speech than is necessary" and struck down portions of the restrictions, including those that prevented Trump from publicly speaking about Smith.
Trump was charged with four counts related to alleged efforts to prevent the transfer of presidential power after the 2020 election. He has pleaded not guilty and denied all wrongdoing.
The former president's legal team argued that any gag order infringed on Trump's right to free speech, especially on the campaign trail, and linked his outspoken criticism about the special counsel's criminal case to his bid to return to the White House. Smith's team, however, contended that some of Trump's public comments and social media posts jeopardized a fair trial and the security of those involved.
The trial was originally scheduled for March, but the case is on hold as the appeals court considers Trump's separate claim of presidential immunity from prosecution. Chutkan rejected that argument last year and ruled that while all trial deadlines are paused, the restrictions of the gag order remain in effect as the appeals process plays out.
Robert LegareRobert Legare is a CBS News multiplatform reporter and producer covering the Justice Department, federal courts and investigations. He was previously an associate producer for the "CBS Evening News with Norah O'Donnell."
veryGood! (6)
Related
- Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
- Why Gaten Matarazzo Has a Deep Fear Ahead of Stranger Things' Final Season
- Why Kieran Culkin Hasn't Met Brother Macaulay Culkin and Brenda Song's New Baby Yet
- Ashley Graham Shares the Makeup Hack That Makes Her Life Easier as a Busy Mom
- Krispy Kreme offers a free dozen Grinch green doughnuts: When to get the deal
- Arrests on King Charles' coronation day amid protests draw call for urgent clarity from London mayor
- We Ranked All of Reese Witherspoon's Rom-Coms—What, Like It's Hard?
- Elon Musk says Twitter bankruptcy is possible, but is that likely?
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- 10 Customer-Loved Lululemon Sports Bras for Cup Sizes From A to G
Ranking
- The city of Chicago is ordered to pay nearly $80M for a police chase that killed a 10
- Kourtney Kardashian Reveals the Secrets Behind Her Guns N' Roses-Inspired Wedding Dress
- Transcript: Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas on Face the Nation, May 7, 2023
- Jennifer Aniston Says BFF Adam Sandler Calls Her Out Over Dating Choices
- Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie return for an 'Encore,' reminisce about 'The Simple Life'
- South Carolina doctors give young Ukraine war refugee the gift of sound
- Tunisia synagogue shooting on Djerba island leaves 5 dead amid Jewish pilgrimage to Ghriba
- Elon Musk gives Twitter employees an ultimatum: Stay or go by tomorrow
Recommendation
Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
Election officials feared the worst. Here's why baseless claims haven't fueled chaos
Get Sweat-Proof Makeup That Lasts All Day and Save 52% on These Tarte Top-Sellers
Google is now distributing Truth Social, Trump's Twitter alternative
Person accused of accosting Rep. Nancy Mace at Capitol pleads not guilty to assault charge
Indian Matchmaking Season 3 Has a Premiere Date and First Look Photos
Google pays nearly $392 million to settle sweeping location-tracking case
AFP journalist Arman Soldin killed by rocket fire in Ukraine